SLAM LAST UPDATED » May 12, 2008 at 12:01 am

Friday, May 9th, 2008  |  72 Comments

Second Round Thoughts from The Commish

I’m just sayin’…

Round Two thoughts…

HORNETS-SPURS: Now — after an impressive 31 and 11 performance — is probably the best time for me to say staunchly, “I’m not impressed, Tony.” Try to dig deeper and feel me on what should be a universal truth, folks: Tony Parker is a Franchise Role Player, not a top flight point guard or upper echelon baller. Parker is no better of a ball player than Tyson Chandler. In fact, Chandler is Parker’s analogous Hornet, not Chris Paul (Ginobli is Chris’ San Antonio counterpart). Chandler fulfills his role (rebounding, muscle, paint-protection) exceedingly well, just as Parker scores, swings passes to open shooters and brings the ball up exceedingly well. He is an undeniably gifted slasher and finisher. He is also, undeniably, gifted at little else. Parker is basically the same player as Monta Ellis. Great scorers, but only really good players. I like how Parker’s assists seem to only come from passes he whips around the perimeter and rarely from actual creating. If Parker — and not Paul — ran point for the Hornets, New Orleans would lose about 15 more games per season. Three of the five best point guards are still playing ball and Tony is not one of them.

I found it comical that folks were, yet again, anointing Parker as some overwhelmingly great player after his performance against the Suns. His 41 and 12 was superb, but is it really a feat to average close to 30 against Nash and the Suns? His test was gonna be this series. How will you fare when you match up against an outlaw like Chris Paul? Almost piss his pants was my prediction.

I loved that the Hornets-Spurs series began with Bowen checking Chris and Chris checking Tony. It’s like Pop said, “We don’t want Tony anywhere near Paul on defense,” and Byron said, “Chris, go rough that dude up…and while you’re at it, keep accounting for 95% of our offense and making us believe, too.” Watch the Hornets when he doesn’t have the ball…he actually tells his teammates when to move, where to go and who they should pass to. It’s profound. Parker’s deficiencies as a well-rounded ball player are on full-blast in this series, because they’re in the context of Chris Paul. Which is why it’s irritating to hear folks say that this is “a matchup between two great point guards” or to hear Dick Stockton say that Parker “quarterbacked” the Spurs to victory.

Chris Paul is a band leader, Parker just plays a mean bassline.

CELTICS-CAVS: I can’t really respect Boston as a respectable playoff squad until they win a road game. I’m yawning at every one of their home-blowouts until they win a toughie on the road. Because, from what we’ve seen so far, the only hallmark of their road games is KG beginning the night in a rabid, manic rage and then purring like a demure kitten when it’s time to throw down. He’s the only “great” player I’ve seen that literally does not want the ball down the stretch. This is what you heard from play-by-play dudes when KG and the Cs were in Atlanta: “KG gets the offensive board with no one between him the basket and…kicks it out to Rondo at halfcourt,” or “KG has Mike Bibby isolated on the left block, but, for some reason, he’s not calling for the ball, instead he looks as if he’s boxing out for a rebound that may or may not come his way within the next few seconds.”

Seriously, who cares what Boston just did, if they go to Cleveland and drop two straight? I mean, this is the squad that went to Texas late in the regular season and came out with a sweep, right? It’s a shame that their road credentials can be called into question at this point in the season. But, admit it, you suspect that the Cavs are gonna follow-up Thursday’s gaffling with a W, don’t you?

PISTONS-MAGIC: This is what Stan Van Gundy had to say about Billups and the impact of his injury: “He is not only a great player, he’s their leader. Chauncey Billups is their guy, and it definitely had a huge effect on the game.” I think Billups is among the handful of Franchise Players in this league, so I obviously agree with Van Gundy. Sheed is the most talented Piston and the cat that gives Detroit it’s Contender Ceiling, but Billups is The Guy. When he went down in Game 3, I happened to be chatting with a friend that happened to grow up in Detroit, your typical delusional homer. I told her that Detroit ain’t winning a game without Billups. She then tried to sell me on Stuckey (whom I like as a youngster), but we all saw what happened in the 4th quarter. Because the Pistons run such an egalitarian outfit, we forget that there’s a hierarchy on that squad and that Billups is at the top. He’s indispensable — even against the Magic. That hammy needs to heal fast.

LAKERS-JAZZ: As much as I dig Booz and Deron, I’m gonna hit you with this question: Do either of those dudes exhibit that transcendent quality that would lead you to believe they (the Jazz) can impede Kobe On A Mission? I’m not calling a sweep, but based on Games 1 and 2, the Jazz seemed doomed. L.A. is my squad and I don’t mind sweeps or dominant performances, but I’m a basketball fan first. The hoops fan in me wants to see this squad get tested, because this is not the kind of historic, classic squad that should be steamrolling through the supposed toughest conference ever. Somebody — hopefully the Jazz — will punch L.A. in the mouth soon (but not too hard).

Vincent Thomas is a SLAMOnline columnist and SLAM Magazine contributor. He can be reached at vincethomas79@gmail.com.

Invite a Friend





Invite a friend    POST A COMMENT

72 Responses to “Second Round Thoughts from The Commish”

May.9 at 1:00 am

Co Co says:
Vince does not heart Tony Parker.

May.9 at 1:15 am

whooo! says:
your take on Parker’s actually kinda interesting. there’s a lot of guys in this league that can only score, and do little else, on their way to All-Star accolades and the Hall of Fame. Parker does that scoring thing incredibly well, but they’re all from inside layups. When he knocks his outside jumper down, or when if he’s ever able to develop it consistently, he becomes UNGUARDABLE. think about it…

May.9 at 1:16 am

whooo! says:
just to add, Paul is better than Parker, it’s a given. but it doesn’t mean it can’t be super exciting to see the matchup of two guys go at it like that. Dominique vs Bird anyone?

May.9 at 1:38 am

RV says:
exactly why he deserved MVP, no one is more valuable to a top notch playoff team than CP, sure puppets can get a laugh or to on their own, but it takes a puppeteer to put on a show

May.9 at 1:44 am

RV says:
i dont think he’d be unguardable, someone like Kobe, who can not only shoot consistently, but also shoot off balanced, on the run, fading away, that’s unguardable, TP being able to shoot just makes him tougher to guard

May.9 at 2:13 am

whooo! says:
yeah, but RV, i can’t think of any guard who’s been able to score so much with such a shaky jumper. if parker had like a David West style mid-range game, he would be unguardable in large part to one major reason - Tim Duncan. for now and probably the next 2 years, nobody is going to double team Duncan’s teammates and leave him open, but rather they double/triple TD on the blocks. with a jumper, that means defenses would never be able to sag off Parker, couldn’t stay in front, and would really get no help defense on him either. as the lone star, defenses could definitely stop him, but on these Spurs, Parker could be that unstoppable.

May.9 at 2:29 am

tealish says:
Hmmmm very interesting…and REALLY surprised you went that far re TP. I understand where you’re coming from and to a certain extent, I believe some overrate Tony Parker’s leadership and his contribution to making the Spurs go. The Spurs are one of those rare teams where it’s a collective effort of the entire unit that knows what to do; there isn’t much quarterbacking needed for the PG spot.
With that said, you’ve wandered from understandable criticism to what the masses love to call, “hate”. Not intense hate, but hate nonetheless.
You make it sound as if Parker is not fundamental to the success of the Spurs. You throw him a bone by calling him a Franchise Role Player, but that’s disrespecting the current Finals MVP. Whether he deserved that award over Tim Duncan, I’m not so sure. But the fact that he’s in the mix can be proof enough of just how much he means to his team.

May.9 at 3:26 am

KA says:
i actually agree on the parker issue but im not gonna sound ungrateful when we need his output to win this series. TP may not have to beat paul, be he has to equal or match his numbers so that they cancel out each other over the course of the game.

May.9 at 3:59 am

Reggie Evans says:
Vince, I think that the potential “problem” with Paul and the Hornets is the same “problem” the pre-Shaq Suns had with Nash: it’s too much dominated by one guy. So if you control that guy - which is no easy task - you can control the team (yes, I stole that from Paul Pierce, but it applies here, too). And that could become a problem in the playoffs. I can see the Spurs wising up and giving Paul what he wants scoring wise, but limiting his distribution opportunities. Like tonight, 9 assists for Paul is like 4 assists for a normal point guard.

May.9 at 5:52 am

SOUSS says:
Shocking, provoking, disturbing!!!Vincent Thomas ladies and gentleman…
Hater!

May.9 at 7:16 am

FLUXLAND says:
Nice work, VT! Btw.. I’m not a smart guy, but can someone explain to me WTF West was thinking fouling KG on a breakaway dunk and essentially sending the game down the toilet? I turned the game off at that point..it was over. And if I were LeBron I would have beat Andy senseless, but clearly he’s a bigger person then I, as I’ve seen him give his team high fives at the end of the game. Cavs are done. They should just forfeit the next two games and save LeBron for next year.

May.9 at 7:24 am

hursty says:
Vince, Parker is better than Chandler. nba live proves this :)
Whoo!- heard of Dwyane Wade?

May.9 at 7:25 am

WhaHuh says:
It didnt take long to knock down Parkers 31 and 11. Comparing him to chandler? not even David West? I’m never surprised by this site, isnt this the second time youve “hated” on Parker.

May.9 at 7:27 am

WhaHuh says:
You also missed the point that Parker DID guard Paul in this match, leaving Bowen on Peja causing mismatch problems. Never let facts get in the way of hate.

May.9 at 7:35 am

hursty says:
and parker and paul effectively nullified eachother stat wise. TP had 2 more assists while CP3 had 4 more points. even I tells ya!

May.9 at 8:12 am

celtics=champs says:
Chris Paul is amazing. Its like commentators say he creates an organized playground out of his squad. I would choose CP3 over Tony Parker any day. Chris makes more of the RIGHT descisions. Like on the break he knows when to pass or take it all the way to the rack.

May.9 at 8:14 am

celtics=champs says:
Chris Paul is amazing. Its like commentators say he creates an organized playground out of his squad. I would choose CP3 over Tony Parker any day. Chris makes more of the RIGHT descisions. Like on the break he knows when to pass or take it all the way to the rack!

May.9 at 8:19 am

Tariq says:
I feel you on Parker’s deficiencies, and there is a parallel between him and Chandler in that they are both limited to what they do best and little else. BUT I want to point out that, as a player, Chandler is not in Parker’s class. TP brings much more to the table. True, his assists come as a by-product of his penetration, and he is VASTLY inferior to CP3 as a point guard, but in a mock draft, I’d take him over Chandler with my eyes closed.

May.9 at 8:20 am

Tariq says:
And I say this even though I hate the Spurs and love Chandler’s intensity, defense and (offensive) rebounding, but truth is truth.

May.9 at 8:23 am

Tariq says:
Also, I totally agree with about Parker’s series against the Suns. It’s very easy to average 30 PPG when you’re matched up against a rip in the space-time continuum where Steve Nash theoretically plays defense.

May.9 at 8:29 am

H to the izzo says:
Tony Parker is the quintessential system player,he has been groomed to play with this team since he was like four.Would be as effective on another team?Probably not.Is he he better than CP3?No,not even in the same league.Do these questions matter?Not really,because he IS effective,being on the perfect team for him shouldn’t be held against him.Sorry for the question talking.

May.9 at 8:49 am

BETCATS says:
I still think Tony Parker has a questionable jumper but he played crazy good last night so good for him

May.9 at 8:52 am

BETCATS says:
also, the Celtics shutdown Lebron James and the rest of the Caviliers play like pinapples so i cant see Boston losing this series. King James should ask for some better help, not just equal confesation in trades.

May.9 at 9:11 am

Silky Slim says:
CP3 is the landlord and Tony Parker is paying rent! CP3 is misusing and abusing TP. For all of the credit and praise that Tim Duncan gets for being a no-nonsense, low key, very coachable player, he is one of the biggest crybabies in the NBA (Rasheed Wallace is # 1). CP3 plays with such an aggressive mean-streak. I love the way CP3 stares down his opponents and how he gives his defender the chicken wing elbow as he’s driving to the basket. I love CP3’s game.

May.9 at 9:13 am

youngmuggsy says:
any 180 lb point guard that scores mainly in the paint deserves a respect. i honestly can’t believe your hating on him, there are 7fters in the league that are scared to score in the paint. he’s better driving to the hoop than iverson, only parker doesn’t have the benifit of a foul being called everytime he misses a layup.

May.9 at 9:17 am

FLUXLAND says:
Slim.. I have never seen teams argue, whine and demonstratively complain about calls like the Spurs, Pistons and now Boston. The Pistons are teh worst, every time the whistle blows against them.. there is 15 second performance right after.

May.9 at 9:18 am

Silky Slim says:
I know the Cavs have been aweful, but the Celtics have played just as poorly as the Cavs. I don’t know what’s giong on with the Celtics. They play hard, but they look slow and disjointed at times, during a game. I think they have too many veteran players. Maybe that’s why they look slow. I can’t see Boston getting past Detroit (that depends on the health of Chauncy Billips).

May.9 at 9:19 am

youngmuggsy says:
silky slim: i think your confused, it was tony parker easily blowing past paul and splitting all of the hornets weak-ass big guys to score almost at will.

May.9 at 9:27 am

Silky Slim says:
I give Spurs credit for winning game 3, but a point guard (Tony Parker) should not be getting called for so many traveling violations in one game. I know a lot of players travel and it’s not called by the refs, but that should not happen with at the point guard position.

May.9 at 9:31 am

Benoit Benjamin says:
Tariq, you just took the words out of my mouth. I agree with you, that parker is a very good point guard, and a perfect fit for the spurs, as the spurs are a perfect fit for him. Paul is much better. but it doesn’t matter, coz when it comes to playoffs hardware, with three rings and one finals MVP (toally deserved, according to me) he has more than a lot of people, including a legend like Isiah. he got even more than Kobe.

May.9 at 9:33 am

Benoit Benjamin says:
My point is, this is a team work, and a team with perfect fit at all positions will always win more than a team with good players and a great one. Which really matters in the end.

May.9 at 10:33 am

Ben Osborne says:
If Chauncey’s hammy would heal better with another couple days rest, wouldn’t it make sense for him to sit out a loseable (word?) game 4 and bring him back full strength for game 5?

May.9 at 10:38 am

Tone says:
I think alot of people are sleeping on Tyson Chandler. The spurs won this game because Tyson was in foul trouble in the 3rd, and if you’ve been watching the playoffs you know that N.O. owns the 3rd. When he went out with 4:30 left in the quarter N.O. was up by two. The Spurs ended the quarter up by 5. During that stretch Timmy finally got going. Please realize that TP being compared to TC is 100% accurate. And no matter what stats TP puts together, he will never match Chrissy’s output. TP is a role player. Chris is the mvp of the league.
However, i was very pleased to see TP embrace the challenge in game 3. Good for him.

May.9 at 10:47 am

Khalid Salaam says:
C’mon vince, tony parker isn’t just some random role player. he’s very good and his impact on games is powerful. the fact that he’s a “system” guy can’t be held against him that much. i can think of a lot of teams that would take him. Playing against The Definition (Paul) just makes Parkers limitations stand out. Kobe is my man and i’m glad that he won the MVP but Paul has done everything i thought he would and could do and imo should have won the award. but thats in the past now. After kobe and bron he’s the best player in the L, and that alone is enough for now.

May.9 at 10:54 am

lane says:
I am a spurs fan — to the core. Grew up there but I agree with everything you said about Parker. I hate that dude.

May.9 at 10:55 am

Young Chris #3 says:
Whoever the female commentator is for ESPN that worked last night’s game should be demoted to hold interview’s at half-time. She was terrible and I cringed every time she would claim that Chris Paul was playing on a level reminiscent of Steve Nash. She also made about 27 other comments that made me wish I could mute her out while maintaining audio for the game and other commentators. It also hurt that she felt the need to dominate the announce team, making sure her voice and opinions were heard throughout roughly 93% of the game. Maybe she should just get fired?

May.9 at 10:57 am

Young Chris #3 says:
And Carlos Boozer’s the new Dirk.

May.9 at 11:11 am

Young Chris #3 says:
I don’t think I’m the only one that would put CP3 about LB23 right now, but if I am, I’ll b that guy…

May.9 at 11:20 am

FLUXLAND says:
Young Chris.. CO SIGN@10:55..listened to one q of that cow a long time ago. Ipod in ears ever since. She makes me want to drown kittens. Does she ever shut up or breathe?

May.9 at 12:10 pm

Sparker says:
rubbish. parker’s a great player. why do i sometimes (okay: often) feel that international players are held to a higher standard in the nba than american players? dirk, nash, ginobli, parker: they’re all really, really good, and can take over games in a way that maybe only 15 others in the league can. and yet everyone dumps on them CONSTANTLY. it’s boring, silly and wrong. hey, i loathe the spurs, but i can still recognize that parker and ginobli are as dangerous as anyone in the nba in the 4th quarter, because given a little room, they will single-handedly win the game

May.9 at 12:26 pm

sora says:
Parker will never be kobe or cp3.
But he is a great player, with his own style.
So whether peops like it or not, this is subjective.Dude has rings, a playoff’s mvp title.
The way he forgot his former shoot to learn a new one, which became kinda deadly is a proof of commitment and hard work.It ain’t cuz I’m French, I even don’t really like the spur’s game, I was not a big fan of TP at his arrival in the league.But the dude worked hard, improved hard and I really grew to appreciate his game.And his wife as well, but that is another story.
Anyway, spurs-hornets is an interesting match up.

May.9 at 12:30 pm

Tariq says:
I just want to point something out about point guards, by the way. There’s a long-held view that point guards should pass first and shoot second, and that a PG who looks for his shot is selfish and bad, while a PG who passes first is pure and good. There is some truth to this, but I feel it gets overblown. Basketball, like all team sports, is about fitting into a system, and if that system requires the point guard to look for his teammates in order for his squad to be successful, but he insists on getting his numbers, then yes, that’s bad. But sometimes your PG HAS to look for his own shot.

May.9 at 12:36 pm

Tariq says:
To emphasize my point about systems, contrast Parker with Jason Kidd, who is probably the purest PG in the last decade. I think Dallas would be a MUCH better TEAM with Parker instead of Kidd. And I’d stick to that statement even if Kidd were in his prime (he’s still not far from his best form, btw). Because Kidd doesn’t have an outside shot, opposing defenses can collapse on Dirk. In fact, the guy who’s supposed to “guard” Kidd plays off him; he doesn’t guard him tightly because he knows he can’t create his own shot. So the entire Mav offense suffers. Whereas if Parker were “quarterbacking” that team, as it were, he would create scoring opportunies for everyone, including himself, through the drive-and-dish. And Dallas might still be in the playoffs.

May.9 at 12:38 pm

Tariq says:
That’s why CP3 is so special: he’s not as good a slasher/scorer as Parker, but he’s pretty damn close. And he doesn’t have the vision of Kidd or Nash, but he’s pretty damn close. And he plays defense and never turns the ball over. And he has a decent enough outside shot. He’s not a 10 at anything, but he’s a 9 at EVERYTHING.

May.9 at 12:48 pm

Silky Slim says:
Tariq….good analogy of CP3’s game.

May.9 at 1:27 pm

Sparker says:
and he has enough hops to dunk on dwight howard

May.9 at 1:40 pm

Tariq says:
Sparker: Yes, but considerably less hops than 2000 Stevie Franchise. So he’s a 9 at that too.

May.9 at 1:41 pm

Tariq says:
Slim: Thanks.

May.9 at 1:45 pm

Russ Bengtson says:
2000 Stevie Franchise’s hops were like a 13 out of 10. Has anyone ever fallen off harder than that guy?

May.9 at 1:52 pm

Tariq says:
Russ: How about Starbury?

May.9 at 2:37 pm

ciolkstar says:
Billups is infinitely more over rated than TP. Who had more assists than Paul last night. Tony will continue to get hated on as long as the ring envy inspired by the Spurs continues to thrive everywhere outside the 210. Haters hate. The Spurs ( and TP) win. Anyone remember how Chauncey played againt CLE in the ECF last year. He fell apart at least as bad as Nash this year. That big/long deal Chauncey just got is going to cost Detroit down the road. 4 rings vs 1. That’s what’s up.

May.9 at 2:42 pm

ciolkstar says:
I usually like the Commish’s stuff but he’s just jealous of the Spurs success , which is understandable. I just hope NO takes TP half as lightly.

May.9 at 2:45 pm

JoeGym says:
Not surprised at the Parker hate at all. If he were from NYC or LA & played in the Big East or ACC growing up there’d be major media slurpage. He doesnt get the love others get b/c no media or fans outside of SA connect with him: a 19yo PG who grew up in France (which brings irrational hate by itself), doesnt do a lot of media, wins a 3rd title w/Finals MVP & marries one of the baddest broads on tv the same summer. Face it, a lot of the media who hype guys like JJ Reddick slept on him & are now envious of his life. And its a lot easier to pump up guys people already know who’ll sell magazines.

May.9 at 2:51 pm

William says:
The closest point guard in history to CP3 might be Isiah Thomas. Same killer instinct.
Same feeling that “if he was 6 inch taller, he might be the best player in the NBA”
With him at PG and Jeff Bower supplying needed talent at a fiscally responsible pace, Hornets will be champ contender for a long long time, possibly snag a championship or two

May.9 at 2:58 pm

ciolkstar says:
last night reminded me of one of those Spurs v. Suns matcups where Nash and Amare put up huge numbers and still lose. NO better not let that become a trend. Spurs in 7. Yup yup.

May.9 at 3:17 pm

Russ Bengtson says:
Tariq: Steph’s always had that aura of doom about him, even when he was putting up numbers. And he can still compete with the best when healthy. Francis, on the other hand, aged about 20 years in the span of a year or so. It’s hard to believe he’s even the same player.

May.9 at 3:38 pm

Tariq says:
Russ: Yeah, that’s true. I wonder if those migraines have anything to do with it.

May.9 at 4:03 pm

albie1kenobi says:
no sleep yet, Tariq? it’s like 4am over there.
CP3’s ascension is the most unexpected and quickest (for me at least) since… wade?

May.9 at 4:12 pm

TADOne says:
Albie: You have been on The Follower, haven’t you?

May.9 at 4:14 pm

tealish says:
lane: at least you’re honest about your hate. Just don’t let that get in the way of appreciating a very good player like Tony Parjer.
Watch: I hate Kobe. He is the best player in the game. But man, I hate him. I really hate him.
See? It’s doable.

May.9 at 4:15 pm

albie1kenobi says:
TAD, no i haven’t checked out the follower in a few days, what’s happening there?

May.9 at 4:27 pm

Tariq says:
albie: I’m GMT + 3. Or ET + 7. So it’s not 4 am at all.

May.9 at 4:30 pm

albie1kenobi says:
i thought you were still in HK? if yes then i’m even more confused.

May.9 at 4:32 pm

H to the izzo says:
Albie:Nobody can keep up with his Globe Trotting.MR.Exeter,indeed.(Riq’ can that be your new nickname?)

May.9 at 4:43 pm

albie1kenobi says:
time to set up a game called “where in the world is Tariq Sandiego”?

May.9 at 5:07 pm

TADOne says:
The World Traveler. Albie: There was an article on there about CP3’s quick rise. I thought you were commenting on that. Oh, it’s Stuckey Time!

May.9 at 5:22 pm

albie1kenobi says:
i gave up on espn a while back. with their never ending list of experts, they still deliver articles that are about as interesting as my data entry documents and as insightful as the cooking direction of cup noodles. i used to find bill simmons interesting, then i found out he’s just a lunatic good for cheap laughs.
i think SLAM spoil me to no end. in any case, DEEEETROIT BASKETBAAAALLLL

May.9 at 5:25 pm

Shooter#9 - Brasil says:
that bullsh*& you can’t compare dudes between NO and SA. they play in completely different style and its just ridiculous to say all this
i love manu, but to say that he is the spurs cp3??? come on!
you just can’t do that.
NO is CP3’s team with good role players. SA is a big 3 team, with descent role players. of course paul is better than parker, thats just not arguable, but you can’t say he is just a role player. TP has been doing a very good job and he is a big part of the spurs success. boston is a bad surprise. they just CAN’T play offence. doc rivers is a shi*&^tty coach and boston is just lost in the offensive end, just putting the ball inside to garnett. ray ray HAS to step up and show some “clutchness” and passion.
lebron is being demoralized. thanks god.
of course his lovers will blame his teamattes and coach again, but its pretty obvious that he is being just ridiculous.
the greatest player ever is being granted open shots cause he can’t shoot???
that really embarrassing.
drive or die basketball is being demoralized by celtics deffence.

May.9 at 7:05 pm

Goose says:
I think your a typical Lakers fan/douche bag Kobe fan. You probably cheer for the Pats or Cowboys in the NFL, Yankees for baseball, and if if you like NHL I’d say maple leaf fan. The points you try to make are blah, all you know is Kobe and the Lakers. New Orleans will make losers out of them and the Celtics will beat New Orleans, thats how it goes…

May.10 at 1:46 am

hursty says:
Smush is better.

May.10 at 1:46 am

hursty says:
*than Tony that is :)

May.11 at 2:49 pm

JoeGym says:
Tony Parker can dunk, so he must be good http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0LXeO_bk6Q

Comments