Nov.30 at 1:47 am

H says:
is it a new model or a vintage?

Nov.30 at 2:17 am

i dont like wearing shoes says:
its ayt, i guess..

Nov.30 at 3:07 am

Chris O says:
I’m a big fan. My hs colors.

Nov.30 at 3:41 am

rob stewart says:
These remind me of a time when I thought a fresh pair of kicks would help me get all the girls phone #’s at school!

Nov.30 at 7:55 am

Andre green says:
89% of Nike classics are classic, these are classic. Just like Isiah Thomas is what classically happens when poison is allowed to brew within a team FIRE Isiah Thomas!!!

Nov.30 at 2:28 pm

Donn says:
These aren’t bad…still like the original colorways..but they’re still pretty clean…

Nov.30 at 7:50 pm

Kristján Þór(from iceland) says:
Wow cool shoes

Dec.3 at 9:42 am

adam says:
Cant go wrong w black and red, especially on a classic.

Dec.3 at 1:05 pm

adelpho3 says:
Yo any pair of Barkleys to me are fresh,and the black and red chicago colourways is a fresh colour on any kicks for real

Dec.4 at 5:18 pm

madscientist says:
Lovin’ the kicks man, these are almost the apitmeny of retro if it wernt for every retro pair of Jordans and the Queations

Dec.5 at 6:01 am

peter lopez says:
They should’nt have re-issued this model, simply put, its downright FUGLY. Reminds me of elephant feet.What Beaverton ought to release is the 2nd CB Air max (94 regualr season issue)& the 3rd version(94 Playoffs edition), both were a pair of classics.

Jan.3 at 1:08 pm

free says:
its vintage with different a colourways.

Jan.6 at 2:52 pm

p0p0y m0L@ says:
very vintage. i had that once. nice color display (before: org/wht/blk). i wonder if they could release the 1st J-Kidd Air Zoom (;”)

Jun.11 at 9:12 pm

zack says:
NO